External & perimeter
We probe internet-facing hosts, VPN edges, and published services for exploitable flaws and weak authentication. The goal is to show what an unauthenticated outsider can achieve against your boundary.
01
Test
Prove what an attacker
can actually reach.
Penetration testing turns theoretical weaknesses into demonstrated impact — so you fix the paths that lead to data, privilege, or downtime, not every scanner alert.
Adversary perspective
Validation beats volume.
Automated scanners generate lists. Penetration testing answers a harder question: can a skilled operator chain misconfigurations, weak credentials, and application flaws into a real compromise? CyberSafe engagements are scoped to your risk appetite — external perimeter, internal lateral movement, web and API surfaces, or focused identity abuse — with rules of engagement that protect production while still producing honest results.
Findings are reproduced, documented with steps and evidence, and ranked by what an attacker gains if successful. Retesting is available after remediation so you can show stakeholders that critical paths were closed, not merely acknowledged.
- Detect
- Triage
- Respond
Capabilities
Engagement focus areas
Choose the surface that matches your release cycle, audit need, or threat concern.
Web & API applications
Business logic, auth flaws, injection, and broken access control get the same attention as classic OWASP issues. APIs are tested as first-class attack surfaces, not an afterthought to the UI.
02
Internal & lateral movement
Starting from an assumed foothold, we map how far privilege and network trust can be abused. This reveals segmentation gaps that perimeter-only tests never touch.
03
Identity & privilege paths
Credential reuse, over-privileged accounts, and weak MFA enrolment are treated as primary attack paths. We document how identity becomes the shortest route to sensitive systems.
04
Process
Testing lifecycle
Controlled aggression with clear communication before, during, and after the window.
- 01
Rules of engagement
Agree targets, timing, out-of-scope systems, emergency contacts, and escalation paths.
- 02
Reconnaissance
Map attack surface, enumerate services, and identify promising entry points.
- 03
Exploitation
Attempt controlled compromise of validated weaknesses within agreed boundaries.
- 04
Impact & evidence
Document what was reached, what data or privilege was obtained, and how to reproduce it.
- 05
Remediate & retest
Support fix verification so critical paths are confirmed closed after remediation.
At a glance
Who needs this — and what changes
Ideal for
- Teams shipping customer-facing apps or APIs on a regular release cadence
- Organizations preparing for customer security reviews or insurance questionnaires
- IT leads who suspect segmentation or identity gaps but lack proof
- Environments where scanners report hundreds of findings without clear priority
- Board or audit requests for independent validation of control effectiveness
Outcomes
- Demonstrated attack paths with reproduction steps and evidence
- Prioritised remediation guidance engineers can implement
- Executive narrative of residual risk after the test window
- Optional retest confirming critical findings are closed
- Clear distinction between theoretical and exploitable issues
Threat landscape
The surface does not sit still.
Cloud estates, identities, vendors, and employee devices shift every week. A once-a-year assessment is a snapshot. CyberSafe treats the attack surface as a live model — continuously scanned, ranked by business consequence, and tied to the work of closing what actually matters.
- Internet-facing services, identity paths, and cloud defaults mapped as one surface
- Automated probing tropes — phishing, credential stuffing, unpatched CVEs — ranked by impact
- A continuous scan model so new exposure is seen before it becomes an incident
Scanning · Cloud360° surface
Schedule a penetration test
Define the surface, set the rules of engagement, and get validated proof of what an attacker can reach — with a path to close it.
Plan a pen test