Policy & standard sets
We draft or refresh policies covering access, data handling, change, incident, and vendor risk — sized to your organisation. Standards translate policy into configuration expectations teams can implement.
01
Govern
Governance that
survives audit season.
GRC at CyberSafe means written policy, mapped controls, evidence you can retrieve, and risk oversight that continues after the auditor leaves.
Operate, then attest
Compliance is a byproduct of control.
Organisations that chase frameworks without operating controls spend every audit cycle reconstructing evidence. We work the other direction: clarify which obligations apply, design a proportionate control set, assign ownership, and establish evidence collection that runs year-round. Frameworks such as ISO-aligned practices, NIST CSF, or sector requirements become a mapping exercise — not a second operating system.
Policies are written for people who must follow them. Procedures match tooling and staffing reality. Gaps are tracked as risks with treatment plans, not buried until the next assessment letter arrives.
- Awareness
- Verify
- Report
Capabilities
GRC building blocks
From policy libraries to evidence packs that auditors can navigate.
Control mapping
Controls are mapped to the frameworks and customer questionnaires you face, with owners and evidence locations. One control can satisfy multiple obligations without duplicate bureaucracy.
02
Readiness assessments
Gap analysis against your target framework produces a sequenced remediation plan. We distinguish documentary gaps from operational ones so effort lands where it reduces real exposure.
03
Governance forums
We help structure security steering, risk reporting, and exception processes so decisions have a home. Escalation paths keep unresolved risks visible to the right level of leadership.
04
Process
How we build GRC maturity
Proportionate to obligations — not a copy of an enterprise binder.
- 01
Obligations
Identify regulatory, contractual, and customer-driven requirements that actually apply.
- 02
Baseline
Assess current policies, controls, and evidence against those obligations.
- 03
Design
Define the control set, owners, and evidence model your team can sustain.
- 04
Implement
Publish policies, close priority gaps, and stand up collection routines.
- 05
Assure
Run internal reviews and support external audits with organised evidence.
At a glance
Challenges versus deliverables
Challenges
- Policies that exist on a share drive but do not match operations
- Audit scramble to assemble evidence every year
- Multiple frameworks creating duplicate control work
- No clear ownership for exceptions and residual risk
- Customer security questionnaires answered inconsistently
Deliverables
- Policy and standard set aligned to your obligations
- Control catalogue with owners and evidence locations
- Gap assessment and remediation roadmap
- Governance cadence recommendations for risk and exceptions
- Support for audit and customer assurance responses
Threat landscape
The surface does not sit still.
Cloud estates, identities, vendors, and employee devices shift every week. A once-a-year assessment is a snapshot. CyberSafe treats the attack surface as a live model — continuously scanned, ranked by business consequence, and tied to the work of closing what actually matters.
- Internet-facing services, identity paths, and cloud defaults mapped as one surface
- Automated probing tropes — phishing, credential stuffing, unpatched CVEs — ranked by impact
- A continuous scan model so new exposure is seen before it becomes an incident
Scanning · Cloud360° surface
Make governance operational
Build policies, controls, and evidence routines that satisfy auditors because they already run — not because you rebuilt them last week.
Discuss GRC